MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2130959745 · doi:10.1002/elps.200390167

Identification of a specifically expressed modified form of novel PSP‐94 protein in the secretion of benign prostatic hyperplasia

2003· article· en· W2130959745 on OpenAlexaff
Kexin Xu, Xianghong Wang, Ming‐Tat Ling, Davy T.W. Lee, Tianyong Fan, Franky Leung Chan, James J. W. Xuan, Sai‐Wah Tsao, Yong‐Chuan Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueElectrophoresis · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Canadian institutionsVictoria Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperplasiaGene isoformSecretionSecretory proteinProstateAlternative splicingGeneRNA splicingBiologyHomology (biology)Molecular biologyEndocrinologyChemistryInternal medicineMedicineBiochemistryCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, we investigated the profile of prostatic secretory proteins in human expressed prostatic secretion (EPS) from benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) patients and compared the patterns with normal controls. We identified three specifically expressed proteins, including prostate secretory protein 61 (PSP61), in EPS from benign BPH patients but absent in normal controls. In addition, we found that PSP61 was a modified isoform of the well-documented PSP-94, which had a perfect matching (100% homology) to the first 61 amino acids of the PSP-94 protein but with a deleted C-terminus. This shortened PSP61 was not due to alternative splicing of the PSP-94 gene at transcription level. Our results provide first evidence on the possibility of using PSP61 as a specific biological marker for diagnosis of BPH.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.349

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectrophoresisSame topicUrinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchFrench-language works237,207