MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131002525 · doi:10.1111/mpp.12190

The Top 10 oomycete pathogens in molecular plant pathology

2014· review· en· W2131002525 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Plant Pathology · 2014
Typereview
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Pathogens and Resistance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersWageningen University FundWageningen University and ResearchBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilNational Institute of Food and AgricultureDirectorate for Biological SciencesAgricultural Research ServiceU.S. Forest ServiceNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekMinistero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della RicercaInstitut National de la Recherche AgronomiqueConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaEuropean CommissionStichting voor de Technische WetenschappenGovernment of Jiangsu ProvinceGatsby Charitable FoundationOregon Department of AgricultureNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaU.S. Department of AgricultureAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsOomycetePhytophthora ramorumBiologyPhytophthora cinnamomiPhytophthoraPhytophthora sojaePhytophthora capsiciPythium ultimumPhytophthora infestansBotanyPlasmopara viticolaDowny mildewMicrobiologyBlightBiological pest control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oomycetes form a deep lineage of eukaryotic organisms that includes a large number of plant pathogens which threaten natural and managed ecosystems. We undertook a survey to query the community for their ranking of plant-pathogenic oomycete species based on scientific and economic importance. In total, we received 263 votes from 62 scientists in 15 countries for a total of 33 species. The Top 10 species and their ranking are: (1) Phytophthora infestans; (2, tied) Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis; (2, tied) Phytophthora ramorum; (4) Phytophthora sojae; (5) Phytophthora capsici; (6) Plasmopara viticola; (7) Phytophthora cinnamomi; (8, tied) Phytophthora parasitica; (8, tied) Pythium ultimum; and (10) Albugo candida. This article provides an introduction to these 10 taxa and a snapshot of current research. We hope that the list will serve as a benchmark for future trends in oomycete research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.992
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it