MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131005731 · doi:10.2113/gscanmin.45.3.437

THE CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF KUDRIAVITE, (Cd,Pb)Bi2S4

2007· article· en· W2131005731 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
T. Balić-Žunić, Emil Makovicky

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrystallographyGeologyCrystal structureGeochemistryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The crystal structure of kudriavite, (Cd,Pb)Bi 2 S 4 , a new mineral species, was solved from single-crystal X-ray-diffraction data and refined to R = 4.9% (4.3% for a model with split mixed-cation sites). Lattice parameters are a 13.095(1), b 4.0032(3), c 14.711(1) A, β 115.59(1)°, V 695.6(1) A 3 . The structure is equivalent to that of synthetic CdBi 2 S 4 , space group C 2/ m , Z = 4, and represents a pavonite homologue, N = 3. It is built of three-octahedron-thick columns of (311)PbS-like slabs combined by “unitcell twinning” in a quasi-mirror-glide succession. The slabs, which are intrinsically of the same topology, differ in the coordination state of bordering cations because of the relative positions of the adjacent layers. In the slabs of type I (the “non-accreting” slab common to all pavonite homologues), the central columns of octahedra are flanked by half-octahedral (square-pyramidal) coordinations completed to split-octahedra by the addition of two S atoms from the adjacent slab. The central columns of octahedra in the slabs of type II (of varying thickness, i.e. , “accreting” in pavonite homologues) are flanked by octahedral coordinations involving a S atom from the adjacent slab. The observed chemical Cd ↔ Pb and Bi ↔ In substitutions are, according to the crystal-chemical analysis, structurally limited to Bi-containing sites. They are distributed predominantly in the boundary coordinations of the type-I slabs, and the central octahedra of the type-II slabs, with Pb preferentially entering the former, and In the latter. The marginal octahedral sites of the type-II slabs, and the central octahedral sites of the type-I slabs, have been refined as pure Bi and Cd sites, respectively. The crystal-chemical analysis suggests that the observed 1:1 Pb:Cd ratio in natural kudriavite represents the upper limit for the substitution of Pb in the structure. A limit of the In substitution is not possible to determine from the present data, but it most probably is less than In:Bi = 1:3. The ratio observed in type kudriavite is less than 1:10.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicCrystal Structures and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207