MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131071295 · doi:10.1126/science.1183670

The Genome of the Western Clawed Frog <i>Xenopus tropicalis</i>

2010· article· en· W2131071295 on OpenAlexaff
Uffe Hellsten, Richard M. Harland, Michael J. Gilchrist, David A. Hendrix, Jerzy Jurka, Vladimir V. Kapitonov, Ivan Ovcharenko, Nicholas H. Putnam, Shengqiang Shu, Leila Taher, Ira L. Blitz, Bruce Blumberg, Darwin S. Dichmann, Inna Dubchak, Enrique Amaya, John C. Detter, Russell B. Fletcher, Daniela S. Gerhard, David Goodstein, Tina Graves, Igor V. Grigoriev, Jane Grimwood, Takeshi Kawashima, Erika Lindquist, Susan Lucas, Paul E. Mead, Therese Mitros, Hajime Ogino, Yuko Ohta, Alexander V. Poliakov, Nicolas Pollet, Jacques Robert, Asaf Salamov, Amy K. Sater, Jeremy Schmutz, Astrid Terry, Peter D. Vize, Wesley C. Warren, Dan E. Wells, Andrea E. Wills, Richard K. Wilson, Lyle B. Zimmerman, Aaron M. Zorn, Robert M. Grainger, Timothy C. Grammer, Mustafa K. Khokha, Paul M. Richardson, Daniel S. Rokhsar

Bibliographic record

VenueScience · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Institutes of HealthNational Cancer InstituteNational Eye InstituteNational Human Genome Research InstituteNational Center for Research ResourcesNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Institute of Mental Health
KeywordsBiologySyntenyXenopusGenomeAfrican clawed frogGeneAmphibianGeneticsEvolutionary biologyComputational biologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Frog Genome The African clawed frog Xenopus tropicalis is the first amphibian to have its genome sequenced. Hellsten et al. (p. 633 , see the cover) present an analysis of a draft assembly of the genome. The genome of the frog, which is an important model system for developmental biology, encodes over 20,000 protein-coding genes, of which more than 1700 genes have identified human disease associations. Detailed comparison of the content of protein-coding genes with other tetrapods—human and chicken—reveals extensive shared synteny, occasionally spanning entire chromosomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations816
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScienceSame topicGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFrench-language works237,207