MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131089166 · doi:10.1095/biolreprod.110.088971

Regulation of Cytochrome P450 1B1 Expression by Luteinizing Hormone in Mouse MA-10 and Rat R2C Leydig Cells: Role of Protein Kinase A1

2011· article· en· W2131089166 on OpenAlexafffund
Subrata Deb, Stelvio M. Bandiera

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of Reproduction · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEstrogen and related hormone effects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiologyProtein kinase ALuteinizing hormoneInternal medicineEndocrinologyLeydig cellCYP1B1Activator (genetics)Protein kinase CKinaseCholesterol side-chain cleavage enzymeCytochrome P450HormoneReceptorCell biologyBiochemistryMetabolism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the present study, we investigated the signaling pathway involved in luteinizing hormone (LH)-mediated regulation of testicular CYP1B1 in mouse MA-10 and rat R2C Leydig cells. CYP1B1 mRNA and protein levels were measured in MA-10 and R2C cells treated with LH and protein kinase activators or inhibitors. Treatment with LH or 8-bromo-cAMP, a protein kinase A (PRKA) activator, increased CYP1B1 expression and PRKA activity in a concentration-dependent manner in both cell lines, albeit to different extents. Treatment with 8-(4-chlorophenylthio)adenosine-3',5'-cyclic monophosphorothioate, Rp-isomer, a PRKA inhibitor, decreased basal CYP1B1 expression and attenuated LH-elicited increases in CYP1B1 mRNA and protein levels and PRKA activity. In contrast, treatment with a protein kinase G activator or an inhibitor of protein kinase C had no effect on basal or LH-induced CYP1B1 expression in MA-10 or R2C cells. Collectively, the results identify PRKA as the major signaling pathway involved in the LH-mediated regulation of testicular CYP1B1 expression in Leydig tumor cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.430

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of ReproductionSame topicEstrogen and related hormone effectsFrench-language works237,207