Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The presumed efficacy of authoritative parenting, supported by a consensus in previous research conducted in authoritative institutions, is tested empirically by investigating the transition to a more authoritarian environment—the Israeli army. Employing a model developed to investigate the transition to university, the present study examines how perceptions of parents’rearing styles and aspects of current relationships with parents affect adjustment to the army as measured by psychological well-being variables, as well as scores on the four facets of the Soldiers’Adaptation to the Army Scale (adapted from the Students’Adaptation to College Scale). A group of 144 Israeli male soldiers was tested at the beginning and end of 3 months of basic training. The results demonstrated that authoritatively reared children were at a disadvantage with regard to successful adjustment to the army. These soldiers were more depressed, experienced greater stress, and had lower self-esteem when compared with soldiers from authoritarian and permissive backgrounds. The results cast doubt on the generalized goodness of authoritative parenting, and instead suggest attention to dynamic relationships between person-related variables and the environmental context.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it