MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131174602 · doi:10.1139/b04-024

Two new marine fungi from China and Singapore, with the description of a new genus,<i>Sablecola</i>(Halosphaeriales, Ascomycota)

2004· article· en· W2131174602 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ka‐Lai Pang, EB Gareth Jones, L. L. P. Vrijmoed

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Botany · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLichen and fungal ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Hong KongCroucher FoundationCity University of Hong Kong
KeywordsAppendageAscosporeMarine fungiBiologyBotanyTaxonomy (biology)AscocarpAscomycotaGenusZoologyEcologySpore

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two new marine fungi from woody substrata collected on sandy beaches of the Pearl River Estuary in southern China (brackish water) and the East Coast Beach in Singapore (fully saline seawater) are described. A new genus, Sablecola E.B.G. Jones, K.L. Pang & Vrijmoed, is introduced to accommodate Sablecola chinensis E.B.G. Jones, K.L. Pang & Vrijmoed, sp. nov, with ascospores having two polar and four equatorial, flattened, attenuate, strap-like appendages with parallel striations, which disintegrate into fine threads when mounted in seawater. Sablecola chinensis can be differentiated from other taxa with a similar ascospore appendage arrangement, such as Halosphaeria and Ocostaspora, by its ascospore appendage morphology. Remispora minuta E.B.G. Jones, K.L. Pang & Vrijmoed, sp. nov. has hyaline and membranous ascomata bearing ascospores with moustache-shaped appendages that are characteristic of Remispora species. This species cannot be accommodated in Haligena, a genus with spoon-shaped appendages at the point of attachment to the ascospores, which are attenuate and channelled.Key words: Haligena, marine fungi, Ocostaspora, Remispora, taxonomy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of BotanySame topicLichen and fungal ecologyFrench-language works237,207