HLA Class II Polymorphisms and Susceptibility to Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) is characterised by multiple laryngeal papillomas. Left untreated, the lesions enlarge, spread, and endanger the airway. Medical treatments are unsatisfactory, and repeated surgery remains the mainstay of therapy. RRP is caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. However, since oral HPV infection is common and RRP is rare, other host and/or viral factors may contribute to pathogenesis. In an attempt to identify such factors, we have investigated 60 patients. The patients were HLA class I, II, and tumor necrosis factor TNF typed by sequence-specific primer PCR, and the results compared to those for 554 healthy controls by using Fisher's exact test. Peripheral blood mononuclear cell proliferative responses of 25 controls and 10 patients to HPV-11 L1 virus-like particles (VLP) were compared. Short-term VLP-specific T-cell lines were established, and recognition of L1 was analyzed. Finally, the L1 open reading frames of HPV isolates from four patients were sequenced. Susceptibility to RRP was associated with HLA DRB1*0301 (33 of 60 patients versus 136 of 554 controls, P < 0.0001). The three most severely affected patients were homozygous for this allele. A range of T-cell proliferative responses to HPV-11 VLP were observed in DRB1*0301-positive healthy donors which were comparable to those in DRB1*0301-negative controls. Individuals with juvenile-onset RRP also mounted a range of VLP responses, and their magnitude was negatively correlated with the clinical staging score (P = 0.012 by the Spearman rank correlation). DRB1*0301-positive patients who responded to L1 recognized the same epitope as did matched controls and produced similar cytokines. Sequencing of clinical isolates excluded the possibility that nonresponsiveness was the result of mutation(s) in L1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".