MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131204153 · doi:10.1109/icc.2007.701

Hybrid Flow-Control for CDMA2000

2007· article· en· W2131204153 on OpenAlexaff
T. Erlichman, Ioannis Lambadaris, P. Larijani

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Network Optimization
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBottleneckComputer scienceCDMA2000QueueComputer networkNetwork packetNetwork congestionQueueing theoryFlow control (data)Active queue managementWeighted round robinReal-time computingQuality of serviceRound-robin schedulingDynamic priority scheduling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A common 'finite-burst' mode of wireless links scheduling in CDMA2000 has been shown to cause occupancy oscillations at the bottleneck shared-queue resulting with large overflow-based closely clustered bursts of data-packets drops. The CDMA2000 gateway (PDSN) node is constructed with superior service-rate compared to its downstream core node (PCF). The rate mismatch further allows for traffic load variations and subsequent congestion at the core node. The use of a Xoff/Xon feedback flow control in CDMA2000 was proposed at the 3GPP2. We evaluate the 3GPP2 backpressure proposal for protecting the bottleneck queue during heavy congestion conditions. We devise an adaptive-Xoff/Xon for tandem queues, which extends the traditional Xoff/Xon to provide threshold adaptation according to overflow prediction. The adaptive-Xoff/Xon complements the RED AQM at the bottleneck node, creating a hybrid flow-control model for tandem nodes. Experimental results show that the hybrid flow-control model eliminates packet discards due to overflow at the bottleneck queue, improves throughput, and lowers the overall data packets drop volume. Packets show to not experience backpressure-based delay variation while traversing the tandem queues. An associated cost is low volume of feedback control packets. Larger tandem-queues' average-delays are observed, which result with lower power-function. Hence, degraded combined performances are delivered by the 3GPP2 proposal for backpressure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Network OptimizationFrench-language works237,207