MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Immune Responses Induced by the<i>Leishmania</i>(<i>Leishmania</i>)<i>donovani</i>A2 Antigen, but Not by the LACK Antigen, Are Protective against Experimental<i>Leishmania</i>(<i>Leishmania</i>)<i>amazonensis</i>Infection

2003· article· en· W2131206903 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInfection and Immunity · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicResearch on Leishmaniasis Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityInstitut National de Santé Publique du Québec
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
KeywordsLeishmania donovaniAntigenBiologyImmune systemLeishmaniaVirologyImmunologyAntibodyLeishmaniasisInterferon gammaVisceral leishmaniasisParasite hosting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Leishmania amazonensis is one of the major etiologic agents of a broad spectrum of clinical forms of leishmaniasis and has a wide geographical distribution in the Americas, which overlaps with the areas of transmission of many other Leishmania species. The LACK and A2 antigens are shared by various Leishmania species. A2 was previously shown to induce a potent Th1 immune response and protection against L. donovani infection in BALB/c mice. LACK is effective against L. major infection, but no significant protection against L. donovani infection was observed, in spite of the induction of a potent Th1 immune response. In an attempt to select candidate antigens for an American leishmaniasis vaccine, we investigated the protective effect of these recombinant antigens (rLACK and rA2) and recombinant interleukin-12 (rIL-12) against L. amazonensis infection in BALB/c mice. As expected, immunization with either rA2-rIL-12 or rLACK-rIL-12 induced a robust Th1 response prior to infection. However, only the BALB/c mice immunized with rA2-rIL-12 were protected against infection. Sustained gamma interferon (IFN-gamma) production, high levels of anti-A2 antibodies, and low levels of parasite-specific antibodies were detected in these mice after infection. In contrast, mice immunized with rLACK-rIL-12 displayed decreased levels of IFN-gamma and high levels of both anti-LACK and parasite-specific antibodies. Curiously, the association between rA2 and rLACK antigens in the same vaccine completely inhibited the rA2-specific IFN-gamma and humoral responses and, consequently, the protective effect of the rA2 antigen against L. amazonensis infection. We concluded that A2, but not LACK, fits the requirements for a safe vaccine against American leishmaniasis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.268
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it