MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131247935 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2004.1377919

A new method of channel feedback quantization for high data rate MIMO systems

2005· article· en· W2131247935 on OpenAlexaff
Mehdi Ansari Sadrabadi, Amir K. Khandani, Farshad Lahouti

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMIMOSingular value decompositionUnitary matrixChannel state informationQuantization (signal processing)Decoding methodsAlgorithmMatrix decompositionComputer scienceChannel (broadcasting)TransmitterControl theory (sociology)Matrix (chemical analysis)Unitary stateMathematicsWirelessTelecommunicationsEigenvalues and eigenvectorsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we study a multiple-input multiple-output wireless system, where the channel state information is partially available at the transmitter through a feedback link. Based on singular value decomposition, the MIMO channel is split into independent subchannels, which allows separate, and therefore, efficient decoding of the transmitted data signal. Effective feedback of the required spatial channel information entails efficient quantization/encoding of a Haar unitary matrix. The parameter reduction of an n /spl times/ n unitary matrix to its n/sup 2/ - n basic parameters is performed through Givens decomposition. We prove that Givens matrices of a Haar unitary matrix are statistically independent. Subsequently, we derive the probability distribution function (PDF) of the corresponding matrix elements. Based on these analyses, an efficient quantization scheme is proposed. The performance evaluation is provided for a scenario where the rates allocated to each independent channel are selected according to its corresponding gain. The results indicate a significant performance improvement compared to the performance of MIMO systems without feedback at the cost of a very low-rate feedback link.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.278
Threshold uncertainty score0.364

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207