Replacement and Positive Evolution of Subtype A and B Respiratory Syncytial Virus G-Protein Genotypes From 1997–2012 in South Africa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Of the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) genotypes previously described in South Africa during 1997-2002, only GA2 and GA5 persisted until 2006, with BA having replaced all previous RSV-B genotypes. This poses the question whether RSV-A is more stable than RSV-B and whether positive selection drives evolution of genotypes. METHODS: RSV-positive specimens were randomly selected during 2009-2012, subtyped, sequenced, and compared to RSV recovered from specimens obtained during 1997-2001 and 2006-2009. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis was performed on the G-protein. RESULTS: Phylogenetic analysis indicated that RSV-A genotype GA2 dissolved to form SAA2 (unique to South Africa), NA1 and NA2 (identified in Japan), and ON1 (identified in Canada and having a 72-bp insertion) and that GA5 drifted from 1999-2012 to form 3 subgenotypes (GA5 I-III). RSV-B genotypes all had the 60-bp insertion typical of BA genotypes but clustered into subgenotypes BA8-10. Positive selection was identified in the G-protein of both subtypes, but RSV-A's rate of evolution was slower than that of RSV-B, with the most recent common ancestors dating from 1945 and 1951, respectively. Seven new positively selected sites were identified in South African strains, 2 for RSV-A and 5 for RSV-B. CONCLUSION: Positive selection drove both RSV-A and -B genotypes to evolve, resulting in replacement of all genotypes over the 15-year study period in South Africa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".