The relationship between peripheral arterial tonometry and classic measures of endothelial function
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the association between peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT) and two more traditional measures of endothelial function - flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and its hyperemic stimulus, hyperemic peak velocity time integral (VTI). We related three vascular function measures (natural log transformed PAT, FMD, and VTI) from 304 patients (mean age 48.9 ± 12.5 years), including 105 with coronary artery disease (CAD). Using linear regression, we studied the relationships between lnPAT, FMD, and VTI, and compared differences in these parameters in those with and without CAD. Although FMD and lnPAT both had a correlation with VTI (Pearson's r = 0.119, p = 0.039 and r = 0.167, p = 0.004, respectively), lnPAT had no correlation with FMD (r = -0.0471, p = 0.414). lnPAT was also lower in patients with CAD compared to controls (mean 0.51 ± 0.19 versus 0.65 ± 0.26, respectively, p < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, VTI remained associated with lnPAT (standardized β = 0.1369, p = 0.04). Among this group of subjects with and without CAD, lnPAT was found to be unrelated to FMD but correlated with VTI. This would suggest that lnPAT is a measure of microvascular function. Although it is unrelated to FMD, lnPAT is decreased in patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease. Further studies are required to determine if this can be used clinically as a tool for cardiac risk stratification and prediction of CAD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it