Roles of Aconitase in Growth, Metabolism, and Morphological Differentiation of <i>Streptomyces coelicolor</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The studies of aconitase presented here, along with those of citrate synthase (P. H. Viollier, W. Minas, G. E. Dale, M. Folcher, and C. J. Thompson, J. Bacteriol. 183:3184-3192, 2001), were undertaken to investigate the role of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle in Streptomyces coelicolor development. A single aconitase activity (AcoA) was detected in protein extracts of cultures during column purification. The deduced amino acid sequence of the cloned acoA gene constituted the N-terminal sequence of semipurified AcoA and was homologous to bacterial A-type aconitases and bifunctional eukaryotic aconitases (iron regulatory proteins). The fact that an acoA disruption mutant (BZ4) did not grow on minimal glucose media in the absence of glutamate confirmed that this gene encoded the primary vegetative aconitase catalyzing flux through the TCA cycle. On glucose-based complete medium, BZ4 had defects in growth, antibiotic biosynthesis, and aerial hypha formation, partially due to medium acidification and accumulation of citrate. The inhibitory effects of acids and citrate on BZ4 were partly suppressed by buffer or by introducing a citrate synthase mutation. However, the fact that growth of an acoA citA mutant remained impaired, even on a nonacidogenic carbon source, suggested alternative functions of AcoA. Immunoblots revealed that AcoA was present primarily during substrate mycelial growth on solid medium. Transcription of acoA was limited to the early growth phase in liquid cultures from a start site mapped in vitro and in vivo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".