MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Solutions for Initial‐Boundary‐Value Problems Representing Gravity Currents Arising from Variable Inflow

2007· article· en· W2131375212 on OpenAlex
J. P. Pascal, T. B. Moodie, Nalan Antar, S. J. D. D’Alessio

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Applied Mathematics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInviscid flowGravity currentInflowMechanicsInertiaBoundary value problemBuoyancyCurrent (fluid)Fluid dynamicsFlow (mathematics)CompressibilityFree surfaceMathematicsGeophysical fluid dynamicsPhysicsClassical mechanicsMathematical analysisInternal waveThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, we report on theoretical and numerical studies of models for suddenly initiated variable inflow gravity currents in rectangular geometry. These gravity currents enter a lighter, deep ambient fluid at rest at a time‐dependent rate from behind a partially opened lock gate and their subsequent dynamics is modeled in the buoyancy‐inertia regime using ½‐layer shallow water theory. The resistance to flow that is exerted by the ambient fluid on the gravity current is accounted for by a front condition which involves a non‐dimensional parameter that can be chosen in accordance with experimental observations. Flow filament theory is used to arrive at expressions for the variable inflow velocity under the assumptions of an inviscid and incompressible fluid moving through an opening of fixed area which is suddenly opened under a lock gate at one end of a large rectangular tank. The fluid in the lock is subjected to a (possibly) time varying pressure applied uniformly over its surface and the finite movement of the free surface is accounted for. Finding this time‐dependent inflow velocity, which will then serve as a boundary condition for the solution of the shallow‐water equations, involves solving forced non‐linear ordinary differential equations and the form of this velocity equation and its attendant solutions will, in general, rule out finding self‐similar solutions for the shallow‐water equations. The existence of self‐similar solutions requires that the gravity currents have volumes proportional to t α , where α≥ 0 and t is the time elapsed from initiation of the flow. This condition requires a point source of fluid with very special properties for which both the area of the gap and the inflow velocity must vary in a related and prescribed time‐dependent manner in order to preserve self‐similarity. These specialized self‐similar solutions are employed here as a check on our numerical approach. In the more natural cases that are treated here in which fluids flow through an opening of fixed dimensions in a container an extra dimensional parameter is introduced thereby ruling out self‐similarity of the solutions for the shallow‐water equations so that the previous analytical approaches to the variable inflow problem, involving the use of phase‐plane analysis, will be inapplicable. The models developed and analyzed here are expected to provide a first step in the study of situations in which a storage container is suddenly ruptured allowing a heavy fluid to debouch at a variable rate through a fixed opening over level terrain. They also can be adapted to the study of other situations where variable inflow gravity currents arise such as, for example, flows of fresh water from spring run‐off into lakes and fjords, flows from volcanoes and magma chambers, discharges from locks and flash floods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.602
Threshold uncertainty score0.482

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it