Longitudinal Change in Thigh Muscle Strength Prior to and Concurrent With Minimum Clinically Important Worsening or Improvement in Knee Function: Data From the Osteoarthritis Initiative
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether a clinically relevant change in knee function in patients with or at risk for osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is associated with concurrent or prior change in thigh muscle strength. METHODS: Participants in the Osteoarthritis Initiative (n = 2,675 [1,485 women and 1,190 men]) with available measurements of isometric muscle strength at baseline, 2-year follow-up, and 4-year follow-up were grouped into those with greater than minimum clinically important worsening (score of ≥6 [of a possible 68] on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index function subscale) between 2-year follow-up and 4-year follow-up, those with greater than minimum clinically important improvement, and those without relevant change. Changes in isometric muscle strength concurrent with function change (between 2-year follow-up and 4-year follow-up) and preceding function change (between baseline and 2-year follow-up), with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), were determined, and differences between groups were assessed by analysis of covariance. RESULTS: Concurrent loss in extensor muscle strength in participants with worsening knee function during the 2-year follow-up-4-year follow-up period differed significantly from that in participants without change in knee function (-4.6% [95% CI -6.8, -2.4] and -2.2% [95% CI -3.0, -1.4], respectively; P = 0.03), as did the concurrent increase in strength among those with functional improvement (2.2% [95% CI -0.3, 4.7]; P < 0.0001). This increase in strength among subjects with improved function remained significantly different from the change in subjects with no change in function after adjustment for covariates, but was preceded by a greater loss in strength (-7.7% [95% CI -10.3, -5.0], P = 0.02) during the baseline-year 2 period compared to those without change in function during the year 2-year 4 period (-4.3% [95% CI -5.2, -3.4]). The decrease in strength during the baseline-year 2 period in those with worsening knee function during the year 2-year 4 period (-4.5% [95% CI -6.9, -2.2]) did not differ significantly from that in patients without a change in function (P = 0.87). No differences in changes in flexor muscle strength were observed between groups. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that there is a positive concurrent longitudinal association between change in extensor muscle strength and worsening/improvement in knee function in patients with knee OA. However, a corresponding change in thigh muscle strength preceding the change in function was not observed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".