MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131380624 · doi:10.1016/s1701-2163(16)34502-9

Wanted: Inclusive Guidelines for Research Involving Pregnant Women

2010· article· en· W2131380624 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Françoise Βaylis, Chris Kaposy

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of NewfoundlandDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStatement (logic)Research ethicsFamily medicineClinical researchEthical issuesEngineering ethicsMedical educationPsychiatryLawPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.274
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.420
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.726
Threshold uncertainty score0.895

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.2740.420
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.005
Bibliometrics0.0080.008
Science and technology studies0.0060.008
Scholarly communication0.0120.009
Open science0.0090.018
Research integrity0.0260.021
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
DomainMethods
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology CanadaSame topicGlobal Maternal and Child HealthFrench-language works237,207