Antimicrobial Substantivity of Chlorhexidine-Treated Bovine Root Dentin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous studies have demonstrated antimicrobial substantivity in root canal dentin up to 7 days after treatment with chlorhexidine. This in vitro study assessed the antimicrobial substantivity of chlorhexidine-treated bovine root dentin over a period of 21 days. Sixty standardized bovine root sections were randomly divided into three equal groups, and their canals immersed in one of the following solutions: (i) sterile saline; (ii) 2.5% NaOCl; or (iii) 0.2% chlorhexidine (CHX). Half the specimens in each group were treated with the solution for 5 min and the other half for 7 days. After solutions were removed, the specimens were incubated at 37 degrees C in Brain Heart Infusion broth containing Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 29212). A fresh inoculum was added to the broth every other day over a 21-day period. The canals were then enlarged with sterile burs, and the dentin shavings collected and cultured for the presence of cultivable bacteria in the dentinal tubules. Specimens treated with CHX for 7 days demonstrated significantly less dentin colonization by E. faecalis than the other specimens. CHX has potential as an intracanal medicament, if it can be applied for a period of at least 7 days.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".