The folding of 5′-UTR human G-quadruplexes possessing a long central loop
Bibliographic record
Abstract
G-quadruplexes are widespread four-stranded structures that are adopted by G-rich regions of both DNA and RNA and are involved in essential biological processes such as mRNA translation. They are formed by the stacking of two or more G-quartets that are linked together by three loops. Although the maximal loop length is usually fixed to 7 nt in most G-quadruplex-predicting software, it has already been demonstrated that artificial DNA G-quadruplexes containing two distal loops that are limited to 1 nt each and a central loop up to 30 nt long are likely to form in vitro. This report demonstrates that such structures possessing a long central loop are actually found in the 5'-UTRs of human mRNAs. Firstly, 1453 potential G-quadruplex-forming sequences (PG4s) were identified through a bioinformatic survey that searched for sequences respecting the requirement for two 1-nt long distal loops and a long central loop of 2-90 nt in length. Secondly, in vitro in-line probing experiments confirmed and characterized the folding of eight candidates possessing central loops of 10-70 nt long. Finally, the biological effect of several G-quadruplexes with a long central loop on mRNA expression was studied in cellulo using a luciferase gene reporter assay. Clearly, the actual definition of G-quadruplex-forming sequences is too conservative and must be expanded to include the long central loop. This greatly expands the number of expected PG4s in the transcriptome. Consideration of these new candidates might aid in elucidating the potentially important biological implications of the G-quadruplex structure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".