The Spi Lake Formation of the central Hearne domain, western Churchill Province, Canada: an axial intracratonic continental tholeiite trough above the cogenetic Kaminak dyke swarmGeological Survey of Canada Contribution 20070462.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Spi Group is a package of plagioclase porphyritic, amygdaloidal basalt flows and sandstone (Spi Lake Formation) conformably overlain by coarse conglomerate and sandstone (Old Boot Formation). These unconformably overlie the Kaminak Lake segment of the Central Hearne supracrustal belt, western Churchill Province. The Spi Group developed in a small, isolated basin (8 km2) and is older than the Paleoproterozoic Hurwitz Group. Our data demonstrate that the basalts of the Spi Lake Formation are genetically related to the ca. 2450 Ma Kaminak dyke swarm, a speculation previously promoted by some workers based on field characteristics alone. They are continental tholeiites with large ion lithophile and light rare-earth element enriched multielement profiles with prominent high field-strength element troughs. The 143Nd/144Nd compositions overlap the contemporaneous chondritic bulk-earth data. All of these are features we infer to have resulted from mixing of melts from dominantly depleted mid-ocean ridge basalt (MORB) mantle with low-degree partial melts of metasomatically enriched sub-continental lithospheric mantle. These composite magmas then underwent clinopyroxene + plagioclase ± olivine fractionation with minor assimilation of local tonalitic middle crust. The Spi Lake basin is <1 km wide, trends 020° parallel to Kaminak dykes but is discordant to the more common 045° to 070° trends of fold keels of the Hurwitz Group. The basin is a graben filled first with basalt and then molassoid sediments, representing the expression of crustal extension associated with Kaminak dyke emplacement. This indicates that the present erosional surface in the region is broadly at the same level as at the time of both Hurwitz and Spi Group deposition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".