Static and dynamic conductivity of warm dense matter within a density-functional approach: Application to aluminum and gold
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The conductivity sigma(omega) of dense Al and Au plasmas is considered where all the needed inputs are obtained from density-functional theory (DFT). These calculations involve a self-consistent determination of (i) the equation of state and the ionization balance, (ii) evaluation of the ion-ion and ion-electron pair-distribution functions, (iii) determination of the scattering amplitudes, and finally the conductivity. We present results for Al and Au for compressions 0.1-2.0, and in the temperature range T=0.1-10 eV. Excellent agreement with recent first-principles calculations using multi-ion density-functional molecular dynamics is obtained where the data fields overlap. We review first-principles approaches to the optical conductivity, including many-body perturbation theory, molecular-dynamics evaluations, and simplified time-dependent DFT. The modification to the Drude conductivity in the presence of shallow bound states in typical Al plasmas is examined and numerical results are given at the level of the Fermi Golden Rule and an approximate time-dependent DFT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".