Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics and Safety of the Oral Antiviral Compound Adefovir Dipivoxil in Children Infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The acyclic phosphonate analog adefovir is a potent inhibitor of retroviruses, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1, and, unlike some antiviral nucleosides, does not require the initial phosphorylation step for its activity. Two oral dosages of the adefovir prodrug adefovir dipivoxil were evaluated in a phase I study with children with HIV infection. A total of 14 patients were stratified into age groups ranging from 6 months to 18 years of age. Eight patients received 1.5 mg of adefovir dipivoxil per kg of body weight, and six patients received 3.0 mg of adefovir dipivoxil per kg. Serum samples were obtained at intervals during the 8 h postdosing and were analyzed for adefovir concentrations. Patients were monitored for adverse effects. All samples collected resulted in quantifiable levels of adefovir (lower limit of quantitation, 25 ng/ml) from each patient. The areas under the concentration-versus-time curves (AUCs) were similar (P = 0.85) for the 1.5- and 3.0-mg/kg doses, while the apparent oral clearance (CL/F) was significantly higher (P = 0.05) for the 3-mg/kg dose. Pharmacokinetic parameters differed by patient age. In comparing those children older and younger than the median age of 5.1 years, AUC (P = 0.03), maximum concentration of drug in serum (P = 0.004), and the concentration at 8 h postdosing (P = 0.02) were significantly lower for the younger children. There were no significant differences for apparent volume of distribution and CL/F normalized to body surface area, but there was a suggestive difference in half-life (P = 0.07) among the subjects in the older and younger age groups. No significant adverse events were encountered. These data provide the basis for a multidose phase II study of adefovir dipivoxil in HIV-infected infants and children.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".