Synthesis and DNA-binding affinity studies of glycosylated intercalators designed as functional mimics of the anthracycline antibiotics
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anthracycline antibiotics such as daunomycin (Dauno) and doxorubicin (Dox) are well-known clinically used cancer chemotherapeutics, which, among other mechanisms, bind to DNA, thereby triggering a cascade of biological responses leading to cell death. However, anthracyclines are cardiotoxic, and drug resistance develops rapidly, thus limiting their clinical use. We report here the synthesis and DNA-binding affinity of a novel class of functional anthracycline mimetics consisting of an aromatic moiety linked to a carbohydrate (1-12). In the targets, the aromatic core consists of a 2-phenylbenzo[b]furan-3-yl, 2-phenylbenzo[b]thiophen-3-yl, 1-tosyl-2-phenylindol-3-yl, or 2-phenylindol-3-yl group that is bound to one of three aminosugars (daunosamine, acosamine, or 4-amino-2,3,4,6-tetradeoxy-alpha-l-hexopyranoside) via a propargyl linker. The DNA binding affinity of these twelve compounds has been evaluated by using both direct and indirect fluorescence measurements. Compared to Dauno and Dox, the DNA binding affinity of these analogues is weaker. However, both aromatic and aminosugar motifs are critical to DNA binding, with more influence coming from the structural features of the aromatic portion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it