Food Sharing Practices in Households Receiving Supplemental Foods for the Treatment of Moderate Acute Malnutrition in Ethiopian Children
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this article is to evaluate food sharing practices in households receiving corn–soya blend (CSB) and ready-to-use supplementary food (RUSF) in southern Ethiopia. Ethiopian children with moderate acute malnutrition from 10 supplementary feeding sites received CSB (1413 kcal/day) or RUSF (500 kcal/day). Data on food sharing and consumption practices were collected from 1125 households via structured questionnaires administered by trained local health professionals after 6 weeks of treatment. CSB was shared among a significantly higher number of family members (1.9 ± 1.0) compared to RUSF (0.1 ± 0.4; P < .001). In only 14% of CSB households, children consumed equal or more than three quarters of the ration, compared to 98% of RUSF households. Only 9% of RUSF households reported food sharing, the majority (86%) of whom were children in the same household under 5 years of age. Comparatively, CSB was shared within the household with a greater number of family members and in greater quantities compared to RUSF. CSB was reported to be widely consumed by all members of the household, whereas RUSF was sparingly shared and only with children under 5 years of age in the household.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it