Impairment of the ubiquitin‐proteasome system in desminopathy mouse hearts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Protein misfolding and aberrant aggregation are associated with many severe disorders, such as neural degenerative diseases, desmin-related myopathy (DRM), and congestive heart failure. Intrasarcoplasmic amyloidosis and increased ubiquitinated proteins are observed in human failing hearts. The pathogenic roles of these derangements in the heart remain unknown. The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) plays a central role in intracellular proteolysis and regulates critical cellular processes. In cultured cells, aberrant aggregation by a mutant (MT) or misfolded protein impairs the UPS. However, this has not been demonstrated in intact animals, and it is unclear how the UPS is impaired. Cross-breeding UPS reporter mice with a transgenic mouse model of DRM featured by aberrant protein aggregation in cardiomyocytes, we found that overexpression of MT-desmin but not normal desmin protein impairs UPS proteolytic function in the heart. The primary defect does not appear to be in the ubiquitination or the proteolytic activity of the 20S proteasome, because ubiquitinated proteins and the peptidase activities of 20S proteasomes were significantly increased rather than decreased in the DRM heart. Therefore, the defect resides apparently in the entry of ubiquitinated proteins into the 20S proteasome. Consistent with this notion, key components (Rpt3 and Rpt5) of 19S proteasomes were markedly decreased, while major components of 20S proteasomes were increased. Additional experiments with HEK cells suggest that proteasomal malfunction observed in MT-desmin hearts is not secondary to cardiac malfunction or to disruption of desmin filaments. Thus, UPS impairment may represent an important pathogenic mechanism underlying cardiac disorders with abnormal protein aggregation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".