PKC phosphorylation modulates PKA-dependent binding of the R domain to other domains of CFTR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Activity of the CFTR channel is regulated by phosphorylation of its regulatory domain (RD). In a previous study, we developed a bicistronic construct called DeltaR-Split CFTR, which encodes the front and back halves of CFTR as separate polypeptides without the RD. These fragments assemble to form a constitutively active CFTR channel. Coexpression of the third fragment corresponding to the missing RD restores regulation by PKA, and this is associated with dramatically enhanced binding of the phosphorylated RD. In the present study, we examined the effect of PKC phosphorylation on this PKA-induced interaction. We report here that PKC alone enhanced association of the RD with DeltaR-Split CFTR and that binding was further enhanced when the RD was phosphorylated by both kinases. Mutation of all seven PKC consensus sequences on the RD (7CA-RD) did not affect its association under basal (unphosphorylated) conditions but abolished phosphorylation-induced binding by both kinases. Iodide efflux responses provided further support for the essential role of RD binding in channel regulation. The basal activity of DeltaR-Split/7CA-RD channels was similar to that of DeltaR-Split/wild type (WT)-RD channels, whereas cAMP-stimulated iodide efflux was greatly diminished by removal of the PKC sites, indicating that 7CA-RD binding maintains channels in an inactive state that is unresponsive to PKA. These results suggest a novel mechanism for CFTR regulation in which PKC modulates PKA-induced domain-domain interactions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".