MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131940011

Osteoporosis in Iran, Overview and Management

2007· article· en· W2131940011 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bagher Larijani, Heinrich Resch, JP Bonjour, HR Aghai Meybodi, M Jamshidian Tehrani

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and osteoporosis research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteoporosisMedicineIncidence (geometry)Hip fractureAsymptomaticBone remodelingEpidemiologyDiseasePublic healthBone Density Conservation AgentsMetabolic bone diseasePediatricsBone mineralInternal medicinePathology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Osteoporosis is the most common metabolic bone disease. It is characterized by low bone mass and micro-architectural deteriora¬tion of bone tissue, leading to enhanced bone fragility and a consequent increase in fracture risk. Osteoporosis is an as¬ymptomatic disease and is an important public health issue because of its clinical expression in age-related fractures. In Iran it is estimated that the prevalence of osteoporosis among women who older than 50 years old is 6 percent which is less than other countries such as Canada and Japan. The estimated lifetime risk of hip fracture for white women at age 50 years is about 16 percent (versus five percent for men). The incidence of fall related hip fracture in Iran in 2003 in male and fe¬male was respectively 20.6 and 17.5 per 100,000 person-year which is increased significantly in old people. Nowadays, sev¬eral treatments are available and more are being developed. Currently available drugs are anti-resorptive which focus on decreas¬ing bone turnover. Newer therapies with the aim of increasing bone formation are being studied. This document out¬lines all aspects of osteoporosis "especially in Iran "including risk factors, diagnosis, prevention and treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.349
GPT teacher head0.604
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicBone health and osteoporosis researchFrench-language works237,207