MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131975287 · doi:10.1137/100795425

Nested Recurrence Relations with Conolly-like Solutions

2012· article· en· W2131975287 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
Topicsemigroups and automata theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCombinatoricsMathematicsFibonacci numberSequence (biology)BETA (programming language)Integer (computer science)Discrete mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A nondecreasing sequence of positive integers is $(\alpha,\beta)$-Conolly, or Conolly-like for short, if for every positive integer m the number of times that m occurs in the sequence is $\alpha + \beta r_m$, where $r_m$ is 1 plus the 2-adic valuation of m. A recurrence relation is $(\alpha, \beta)$-Conolly if it has an $(\alpha, \beta)$-Conolly solution sequence. We discover that Conolly-like sequences often appear as solutions to nested (or meta-Fibonacci) recurrence relations of the form $A(n) = \sum_{i=1}^k A(n-s_i-\sum_{j=1}^{p_i} A(n-a_{ij}))$ with appropriate initial conditions. For any fixed integers k and $p_1,p_2,\ldots, p_k$ we prove that there are only finitely many pairs $(\alpha, \beta)$ for which $A(n)$ can be $(\alpha, \beta)$-Conolly. For the case where $\alpha =0$ and $\beta =1$, we provide a bijective proof using labeled infinite trees to show that, in addition to the original Conolly recurrence, the recurrence $H(n)=H(n-H(n-2)) + H(n-3-H(n-5))$ also has the Conolly sequence as a solution. When $k=2$ and $p_1=p_2$, we construct an example of an $(\alpha,\beta)$-Conolly recursion for every possible ($\alpha,\beta)$ pair, thereby providing the first examples of nested recursions with $p_i>1$ whose solutions are completely understood. Finally, in the case where $k=2$ and $p_1=p_2$, we provide an if and only if condition for a given nested recurrence $A(n)$ to be $(\alpha,0)$-Conolly by proving a very general ceiling function identity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.833
Threshold uncertainty score0.522

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it