Effect of antihypertensive treatment on small artery remodeling in hypertension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Blood vessels are remodeled in hypertension both structurally and functionally. The changes that occur in their structure, mechanical properties, and function contribute to blood pressure elevation and to complications of hypertension. We studied the remodeling of small arteries in experimental animals and humans. Smooth muscle cells of small arteries are restructured around a smaller lumen, with significant remodeling of the extracellular matrix and collagen and fibronectin deposition. Interestingly, there is no evidence of net growth of the vascular wall (which results in so-called eutrophic remodeling), particularly in the milder forms of human essential hypertension. Hypertrophic remodeling and increased small artery stiffness may be found in more severe forms of hypertension. Almost all hypertensive patients have vascular structural remodeling. However, only some exhibit endothelial dysfunction. This is particularly true in mild hypertension, in which endothelial dysfunction is less common. A 1-year treatment of hypertensive patients with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonists, and long acting calcium channel blockers corrected small artery structure and, to variable degrees depending on the agents used, impaired endothelial function. In contrast, beta blockers did not improve structure, function, or mechanics of vessels. When beta-blocker-treated patients were switched to an AT1 receptor antagonist, small artery structure and impaired endothelial function were corrected. The vascular protective action of some antihypertensive agents may contribute to improve outcome for hypertensive patients, although this is presently unproven.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".