Using a Variety of Methods to Facilitate Redecisions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AbstractRedecision therapy has been fundamental to the authors' practice of psychotherapy since 1971. They describe using several methods to help patients accomplish redecisions and provide examples of well-known redecision methods as well as the use of Chaoyi Fanhuan Qigong (CFQ Healing Qigong), Emotional Freedom Technique, and Logosynthesis to facilitate redecisions. Additional informationNotes on contributorsNancy Porter-SteeleCurtis A. Steele, M.D., Certified Transactional Analyst (psychotherapy), is a psychiatrist. Nancy Porter-Steele, Ph.D., Teaching and Supervising Transactional Analyst (psychotherapy), is a psychotherapist and trainer. They have worked together since their training in 1971 with Bob and Mary Goulding at the Western Institute for Group and Family Therapy. In recent years both have become certified in CFQ Healing Qigong and Logosynthesis™. Both are also meditation instructors in the Shambhala tradition. They can be reached at 6095 Coburg Road #706, Halifax, Nova Scotia BH 4K1, Canada; email: steele@ns.sympatico.ca.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.042 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it