MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132181428 · doi:10.1142/s2301385013300011

Developments in Visual Servoing for Mobile Manipulation

2013· article· en· W2132181428 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueUnmanned Systems · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisual servoingArtificial intelligenceComputer visionComputer scienceRoboticsServoMobile robotVisual controlServo controlRobotControl engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new trend in mobile robotics is to integrate visual information in feedback control for facilitating autonomous grasping and manipulation. The result is a visual servo system, which is quite beneficial in autonomous mobile manipulation. In view of mobility, it has wider application than the traditional visual servoing in manipulators with fixed base. In this paper, the state of art of vision-guided robotic applications is presented along with the associated hardware. Next, two classical approaches of visual servoing: image-based visual servoing (IBVS) and position-based visual servoing (PBVS) are reviewed; and their advantages and drawbacks in applying to a mobile manipulation system are discussed. A general concept of modeling a visual servo system is demonstrated. Some challenges in developing visual servo systems are discussed. Finally, a practical application of mobile manipulation system which is developed for applications of search and rescue and homecare robotics is introduced.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.163
Threshold uncertainty score0.389

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it