MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132361915 · doi:10.1667/rr1220.1

Regulation of the Low-Dose Radiation Paracrine-Specific Anchorage-Independent Growth Response by Annexin A2

2009· article· en· W2132361915 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas J. Weber, Lee K. Opresko, David M. Waisman, Greg J. Newton, Ryan D. Quesenberry, Nikki Bollinger, Ronald Moore, Richard Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueRadiation Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicS100 Proteins and Annexins
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnnexin A2Paracrine signallingAnnexinGrowth factorAutocrine signallingCell biologyBiologyCell cultureCell growthMolecular biologyChemistryReceptorBiochemistryGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Weber, T. J., Opresko, L. K., Waisman, D. M., Newton, G. J., Quesenberry, R. D., Bollinger, N., Moore, R. J. and Smith, R. D. Regulation of the Low-Dose Radiation Paracrine-Specific Anchorage-Independent Growth Response by Annexin A2. Radiat. Res. 172, 96-105 (2009).Here we identify the release of annexin A2 into the culture medium in response to low-dose X-radiation exposure and establish functional linkages to an established paracrine factor-mediated anchorage-independent growth response. Using a standard bicameral coculture model, we demonstrate that annexin A2 is secreted into the medium by irradiated cells (seeded in upper chamber) and is capable of binding to nonirradiated neighboring cells (seeded in lower chamber). The paracrine factor-mediated anchorage-independent growth response to low-dose X irradiation is reduced when irradiated annexin A2-silenced (shRNA) JB6 cells are co-cultured with nonirradiated cells relative to co-culture with irradiated annexin A2-competent vector control cells. Consistent with this observation, purified bovine annexin A2 tetramer induces anchorage-independent growth. These observations suggest that annexin A2 regulates, in part, the radiation paracrine factor-specific anchorage-independent growth response in JB6 cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.283
Threshold uncertainty score0.404

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRadiation ResearchSame topicS100 Proteins and AnnexinsFrench-language works237,207