MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132394148 · doi:10.1002/mrc.1052

Use of <sup>19</sup>F NMR spectroscopy to probe enzymatic oxidation of fluorine‐tagged sulfides

2002· article· en· W2132394148 on OpenAlexafffund
Behnaz Behrouzian, Derek J. Hodgson, Christopher K. Savile, Brian A. Dawson, Peter H. Buist, John Shanklin

Bibliographic record

VenueMagnetic Resonance in Chemistry · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors
Canadian institutionsHealth CanadaCarleton University
FundersBasic Energy SciencesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsChemistryChemoselectivitySubstituentSubstrate (aquarium)EnzymeNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyFluorine-19 NMRFatty acidStereochemistryOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A novel 19F NMR‐based method for monitoring the enzymatic oxidation of thia fatty acid analogues is presented. Our approach is based on the observation that methyl ω‐monofluorinated 9‐thia‐ and 10‐thiaoctadecanoates and their S‐oxide and S‐dioxide derivatives are easily distinguishable via their 1H‐decoupled 19F spectra. These long‐range substituent effects were used to probe the regio‐ and chemoselectivity of stearoyl ACP (acyl carrier protein) Δ9 desaturase‐mediated sulfoxidation. The results clearly demonstrate that mono‐oxygenation of a 10‐thia analogue ACP Δ9 desaturase was more efficient than that of a 9‐thia substrate. A product previously undetected by TLC was observed for the first time in the product mixture obtained from 18‐fluoro‐9‐thiaoctadecanoyl‐ACP. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMagnetic Resonance in ChemistrySame topicPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated ReceptorsFrench-language works237,207