Alexithymia and Acne Vulgaris: A Case Control Study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
terest in alexithymia has increased considerably over the past decade. Recent research has suggested that alexi-thymia can be considered as one of several possible risk factors for a variety of medical and psychiatric disorders, as it may increase susceptibility to the development of a variety of diseases in addition to genetic determinants and emotional stress. 5 Hence, it is not surprising that alexithymic individuals, who fail to cope with stress and have difficulties in communicating their feelings, are at risk of the development of certain specific dermatologic diseases. Because of their alexithymic features, they tend to develop fewer close relationships and less social skills, and this social incompetence may also adversely affect their health and general well-being. Data suggest that screening for alexithymia may also be useful in order to reveal the role of emotional dysregulation as a triggering factor in some patients with chronic skin diseases. he dermatological conditions most commonly and consistently found to be associated with psychiatric or psychological morbidity are psoriasis, 1,8 acne 1,8 and atopic eczema. Acne is the most common problem that presents to dermatologists. Because it causes visible disfiguring of the face, it produces a great deal of embarrassment, frustration, anger, and depression in patients. In addition, acne is most common in adolescence and young adulthood, a time when patients are least capable of coping with additional stress. As a result, it is virtually impossible to separate acne and psychiatric disturbances.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it