Molecular cloning and characterization of an endo-β-mannanase gene expressed in the lettuce endosperm following radicle emergence
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Endo-β-mannanase (EC 3.2.1.78), an enzyme that mobilizes the endosperm cell walls of the lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L.) seed, increases in activity in the micropylar and lateral regions of this tissue following the completion of germination. Its complementary DNA (cDNA) sequence ( LsMan1 ) was determined using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with degenerate primers. The 3‘-end of the cDNA sequence was obtained by 3‘-end rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE), and the 5‘-end sequence by genome walking and 5‘-end RACE. The predicted amino acid sequence from the cDNA has a high identity with endo-β-mannanases present in other species (e.g. 67% identity with coffee β-1,4-mannan endohydrolase, 62% identity with tomato fruit endo-β-mannanase). Southern blot analysis suggests the presence of several members of an endo-β-mannanase gene family in the lettuce genome. Several isoforms of the enzyme, including three major ones, were detected by isoelectric focusing. Based on Northern blot analysis, accumulation of the endo-β-mannanase mRNA occurred only after lettuce seeds had germinated, and increased thereafter, although enzyme activity persisted after transcription declined.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it