MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132438125 · doi:10.1189/jlb.72.4.769

Human eosinophils express and release IL-13 following CD28-dependent activation

2002· article· en· W2132438125 on OpenAlexafffund
Gaëtane Woerly, Paige Lacy, Aména Ben Younes, Nadine Roger, Sylvie Loiseau, Redwan Moqbel, Moníque Capron

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Leukocyte Biology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchInstitute Pasteur De LilleInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleUniversité de Lille
KeywordsBiologyCD28Cell biologyImmunologyCancer researchMolecular biologyT cellImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human eosinophils produce a large number of cytokines, including immunoregulatory cytokines. Given that eosinophils store and release interleukin (IL)-4, a key cytokine in the pathogenesis of allergic inflammation, and that IL-4 and IL-13 share common biological functions, we investigated the possibility that IL-13 may be synthesized by these cells. Using flow cytometry and immunocytochemistry, we show that eosinophils synthesize and store IL-13. Granule localization was demonstrated after subcellular fractionation, and IL-13 immunoreactivity was localized to crystalloid, granule-enriched fractions. Furthermore, electron microscopic analyses specifically localized IL-13 to the dense cores of bicompartmental secondary granules. Upon CD28 ligation, IL-13 was released by eosinophils, whereas a combination of CD28 and immunoglobulin A complexes resulted in decreased IL-13 secretion. Furthermore, eosinophil-derived IL-13 exerts a biological effect, inducing CD23 expression on B cells. By having the capacity to synthesize and release IL-13, eosinophils may participate in the development and maintenance of the T helper cell type 2 response, a prominent feature of allergic diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.711
Threshold uncertainty score0.349

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations96
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Leukocyte BiologySame topicAsthma and respiratory diseasesFrench-language works237,207