MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132462735 · doi:10.1109/tmag.2006.880998

A Note on “Signal-to-Noise Ratio Mismatch for Low-Density Parity-Check Coded Magnetic Recording Channels” by W. Tan and J. R. Cruz

2006· article· en· W2132462735 on OpenAlexaff
Hamid Saeedi, Amir H. Banihashemi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Magnetics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicError Correcting Code Techniques
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLow-density parity-check codeSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)GaussianChannel (broadcasting)PhysicsAlgorithmComputer scienceStatisticsMathematicsTelecommunicationsDecoding methodsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this letter, we prove that the minimum signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) threshold of the iterative belief propagation algorithm for a low-density parity-check (LDPC) coded magnetic recording channel is obtained when the SNR mismatch factor is half the ratio of variance to mean for the Gaussian distribution at the channel output. This result was first observed by Tan and Cruz empirically

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.682
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on MagneticsSame topicError Correcting Code TechniquesFrench-language works237,207