MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132581719 · doi:10.1002/jcc.21053

Prediction of integral membrane protein type by collocated hydrophobic amino acid pairs

2008· article· en· W2132581719 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computational Chemistry · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMachine Learning in Bioinformatics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeature selectionComputer scienceClassifier (UML)Benchmark (surveying)Transmembrane proteinFeature (linguistics)Transmembrane domainIntegral membrane proteinSequence (biology)Artificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Membrane proteinAlgorithmBiological systemChemistryAmino acidMembraneBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A computational model, IMP-TYPE, is proposed for the classification of five types of integral membrane proteins from protein sequence. The proposed model aims not only at providing accurate predictions but most importantly it incorporates interesting and transparent biological patterns. When contrasted with the best-performing existing models, IMP-TYPE reduces the error rates of these methods by 19 and 34% for two out-of-sample tests performed on benchmark datasets. Our empirical evaluations also show that the proposed method provides even bigger improvements, i.e., 29 and 45% error rate reductions, when predictions are performed for sequences that share low (40%) identity with sequences from the training dataset. We also show that IMP-TYPE can be used in a standalone mode, i.e., it duplicates significant majority of correct predictions provided by other leading methods, while providing additional correct predictions which are incorrectly classified by the other methods. Our method computes predictions using a Support Vector Machine classifier that takes feature-based encoded sequence as its input. The input feature set includes hydrophobic AA pairs, which were selected by utilizing a consensus of three feature selection algorithms. The hydrophobic residues that build up the AA pairs used by our method are shown to be associated with the formation of transmembrane helices in a few recent studies concerning integral membrane proteins. Our study also indicates that Met and Phe display a certain degree of hydrophobicity, which may be more crucial than their polarity or aromaticity when they occur in the transmembrane segments. This conclusion is supported by a recent study on potential of mean force for membrane protein folding and a study of scales for membrane propensity of amino acids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.424

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it