Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pulmonary artery pseudoaneurysm secondary to metastatic angiosarcoma A 70 year old woman presented to the emergency department with haemoptysis and right sided chest pain. Of significance was a prior history of angiosarcoma arising from soft tissues in the neck. A contrast enhanced helical CT scan of the thorax was performed to exclude pulmonary emboli. Multiple lung nodules were seen, some of which were cavitary. This was associated with a small left hydropneumothorax and a small right pleural effusion (fig Several lung nodules were surrounded by ground glass opacity, and one of the right lower lobe lung metastases was observed to be contiguous with a subsegmental branch of the right anterior basal pulmonary artery and a pseudoaneurysm (fig There was no history of pulmonary angiography, Swan-Ganz catheterisation, percutaneous needle biopsy of the lung, or pneumonia. The patient had no further haemoptysis and the chest pain abated on its own after a few hours so, because of her age and diffuse metastatic disease, no intervention was performed. It is presumed that the pseudoaneurysm resulted from erosion of an angiosarcoma metastasis into a subsegmental pulmonary artery resulting in haemoptysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".