The Late Ordovician Dawson Point Formation (Timiskaming outlier, Ontario): key to a new regional synthesis of Richmondian–Hirnantian carbonate and siliciclastic magnafacies across the central Canadian craton
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Current paleogeographic reconstructions extend Late Ordovician Taconic-derived siliciclastics across the central Canadian craton prior to the terminal Ordovician glacioeustatic lowstand. Revision of the Late Ordovician Dawson Point Formation of the Timiskaming outlier greatly reduces the distribution of these siliciclastics, and documents a greater spread of shallow-water carbonate of Richmondian age. As revised, the Dawson Point Formation contains two informal members: a deep-water graptolitic shale that grades upward into shallow-water siliciclastic redbeds, and an upper member of shallow-water, muddy, crinoidal limestone with interbedded shale, likely representing low-energy shoals on a muddy shelf. Deep-water shale accumulation began in the upper manitoulinensis graptolite Zone following foundering of the regional foreland carbonate platform. Basin development documents a northward-younging (~1 million years) from southern Ontario foreland basins, in keeping with regional tectonic-driven transgression along eastern North America. The shale-to-carbonate succession of the Dawson Point Formation correlates with the Georgian Bay Formation on Manitoulin Island, wherein the upper carbonate-dominated divisions of both formations are equivalent to the siliciclastic Queenston Formation of southern Ontario. In absence of additional biostratigraphic information, the upper member of the Dawson Point Formation is likely Richmondian (or late Ashgillian) in age. The revised Late Ordovician history of the Timiskaming outlier may identify a once significant volume of shallow-water carbonate across the central Canadian craton, with related sequestration of carbon dioxide possibly aiding global cooling. Erosion of the carbonate, driven by developing glacioeustatic lowstand conditions, was likely contemporaneous with early Hirnantian peritidal deposition of the uppermost Queenston Formation in southern Ontario.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".