MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132669196 · doi:10.1002/micr.20454

Establishment of duodenojejunal bypass surgery in mice: A model designed for diabetic research

2008· article· en· W2132669196 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrosurgery · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityLawson Health Research InstituteLondon Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineJejunumDuodenumAnastomosisBiliopancreatic DiversionSurgeryDiabetes mellitusMicrosurgeryRoux-en-Y anastomosisGeneral surgeryInternal medicineGastric bypassWeight lossEndocrinologyObesity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have developed a mouse duodenojejunal bypass (DJB) surgical model that is for studying the effects of bariatric surgery on glucose homeostasis and has potential to impact clinical therapy of diabetes. The operation consists of using the majority of the duodenum and proximal part of the jejunum for biliopancreatic diversion. The distal end of the jejunum is anastomosed in an end-to-end fashion to the remaining proximal end of the duodenum just distal to the pylorus. The biliopancreatic secretions are diverted into the distal jejunum through an end-to-side anastomosis. We performed 10 DJB operations in C57BL/6 mice, with a 100% survival rate. The surgery had no effect on the growth or feeding patterns of the animals. The intestinal mucosa showed normal histology and function. This study confirms that it is technically possible to perform DJB surgery in mice. This mouse model can be used in the study of surgical treatment for type II diabetes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.293
Threshold uncertainty score0.840

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it