Bibliographic record
Abstract
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is still a disease with significant mortality. Although 5 yr after diagnosis 92% of patients are alive, the prognosis falls to 82% survival at 10 yr, 76% at 15 yr and only 68% at 20 yr in Toronto w1x. There has been improvement in survival, with the standardized mortality ratio in patients recruited to the Toronto cohort in 1970–1977 being 10.1 (95% CI 6.5–15.0), compared with 3.3 (95% CI 1.8–5.7) for those recruited between 1986 and 1994 w2x. Data from other centres in the USA and Europe has been similar. Studies published around 1980 found that about 80% of patients survived 5 yr and about 60% of patients survived 10 yr. More recent studies have shown that 5-yr survival is now nearer 90–95% and that 70–85% of patients survive 10 yr w3x. In most studies, patients with renal involvement have had a poorer prognosis than those without renal disease. Nevertheless, survival has shown improvement in those with renal disease presenting to a UK centre between 1976 and 1986 (81% 10-yr survival), compared with those presenting between 1963 and 1975 (56% 10-yr survival) w4x. The commonest cause of death has been infection, both in early and late deaths w1, 3x. Active SLE contributes to about a third of early deaths but less commonly to late deaths. However, deaths related to acute and chronic vascular disease including sudden death are more common in those dying more than 5 yr after diagnosis. However, there is more to prognosis than just death. There is considerable morbidity associated with more prolonged survival after the diagnosis of SLE. Most physicians caring for lupus patients will be familiar with patients in whom active disease has resolved but the patients have suffered from symptoms related to the accumulation of chronic damage w5x. Both active disease and damage can be associated with impaired quality of life and reduced functional ability, although other factors such as the psycho-social background of the patient will affect a patient’s perception of their disease as well w6x. Having improved therapy for active lupus disease, the challenge is now to understand and prevent the long-term complications of this disease, whether they are due to effects of the disease itself, the therapies used, or co-morbid disease (perhaps with associated underlying disease mechanisms or linked genetic predisposition).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".