SMIT2 mediates all myo-inositol uptake in apical membranes of rat small intestine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study presents the characterization of myo-inositol (MI) uptake in rat intestine as evaluated by use of purified membrane preparations. Three secondary active MI cotransporters have been identified; two are Na(+) coupled (SMIT1 and SMIT2) and one is H(+) coupled (HMIT). Through inhibition studies using selective substrates such as d-chiro-inositol (DCI, specific for SMIT2) and l-fucose (specific for SMIT1), we show that SMIT2 is exclusively responsible for apical MI transport in rat intestine; rabbit intestine appears to lack apical transport of MI. Other sugar transport systems known to be present in apical membranes, such as SGLT1 or GLUT5, lacked any significant contribution to MI uptake. Functional analysis of rat SMIT2 activity, via electrophysiological studies in Xenopus oocytes, demonstrated similarities to the activities of SMIT2 from other species (rabbit and human) displaying high affinities for MI (0.150 +/- 0.040 mM), DCI (0.31 +/- 0.06 mM), and phlorizin (Pz; 0.016 +/- 0.007 mM); low affinity for glucose (36 +/- 7 mM); and no affinity for l-fucose. Although these functional characteristics essentially confirmed those found in rat intestinal apical membranes, a unique discrepancy was seen between the two systems studied in that the affinity constant for glucose was approximately 40-fold lower in vesicles (K(i) = 0.94 +/- 0.35 mM) than in oocytes. Finally, the transport system responsible for the basolateral efflux transporter of glucose in intestine, GLUT2, did not mediate any significant radiolabeled MI uptake in oocytes, indicating that this transport system does not participate in the basolateral exit of MI from small intestine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".