MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132747505 · doi:10.1093/jac/dkf810

The PROTEKT surveillance study: antimicrobial susceptibility of <i>Haemophilus influenzae</i> and <i>Moraxella catarrhalis</i> from community-acquired respiratory tract infections

2002· article· en· W2132747505 on OpenAlexaff
Daryl J. Hoban, D. Felmingham

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPneumonia and Respiratory Infections
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMoraxella catarrhalisHaemophilus influenzaeMicrobiologyAmpicillinMoraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalisAmp resistanceMoraxellaCiprofloxacinAntibioticsMoxifloxacinLevofloxacinBiologyBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents data relating to Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis from PROTEKT (1999-2000), a surveillance study that examined the susceptibility of respiratory pathogens to current and new antibacterials. Beta-lactamase production is the principal mechanism of resistance to ampicillin and other beta-lactam antibacterials in H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis. The PROTEKT study showed that globally, the prevalence of beta-lactamase production in H. influenzae varied considerably: of 2948 isolates, 489 (16.6%) were beta-lactamase-positive [range: 1.8% (Italy) to 65% (South Korea)]. Beta-lactamase-negative, ampicillin-resistant (BLNAR) strains of H. influenzae were uncommon (<0.1%) but their very detection highlights the need for continued vigilance. Overall, few isolates of H. influenzae showed resistance to either macrolides or telithromycin. The emergence of clarithromycin-resistant strains is worrying, however, as such isolates may also show resistance to other macrolides. There was a geographical correlation between beta-lactamase production and the prevalence of resistance to chloramphenicol and tetracycline among the H. influenzae isolates. Of 1131 M. catarrhalis isolates, 92% were beta-lactamase-positive. Most isolates, however, were fully susceptible to nearly all the antibacterials tested, except ampicillin. The most active were ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin (both having MIC(90) values of 0.03 mg/L), moxifloxacin (MIC(90) 0.06 mg/L), azithromycin (MIC(90) < or = 0.06 mg/L) and telithromycin (MIC(90) 0.12 mg/L). Overall, there were no concerns in terms of resistance to fluoroquinolones for both H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis. In summary, the PROTEKT surveillance study confirmed the problem of widespread prevalence of beta-lactamase-producing strains of H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis, although these pathogens generally remain susceptible to macrolides, fluoroquinolones and the new ketolide telithromycin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.503
Threshold uncertainty score0.930

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations152
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Antimicrobial ChemotherapySame topicPneumonia and Respiratory InfectionsFrench-language works237,207