MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132808681 · doi:10.1306/03030605193

Reserves growth in a mature oil field: The Devonian Leduc Formation at Innisfail field, south-central Alberta, Canada

2006· article· en· W2132808681 on OpenAlexaffabout
Stacy C. Atchley, Lawrence W. West, Jeff R. Sluggett

Bibliographic record

VenueAAPG Bulletin · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsAlberta Energy
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDevonianGeologyOil fieldField (mathematics)Paleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Oil has been continuously produced from the Devonian Leduc Formation at Innisfail field since its discovery in 1957. To date, cumulative production at Innisfail is 98.9% of recoverable oil in place (84.3 MMBO) and indicates that the Leduc is near the end of its productive life. A sequence-stratigraphic interpretation produced from core, well logs, and three-dimensional (3-D) reflection seismic data, however, suggests that production may be extended through the development of two previously undetected scenarios of bypassed oil entrapment: (1) attic oil accumulations associated with small buildups atop the isolated Innisfail platform and (2) backstep-edge accumulations located in positions structurally low to currently producing wells. In both cases, oil accumulations are related to a Leduc depositional history that was characterized by rates of long-term carbonate sediment accumulation exceeded by the rate of sea level rise. Positive bathymetric relief created at the time of deposition and, subsequently, present-day stratigraphic traps were produced during the final phase of stratal retrogradation that immediately preceded the drowning of the isolated Innisfail platform. High-quality 3-D seismic data are essential in the exploration for both attic and backstep-edge oil accumulations at Innisfail. Integration of 3-D seismic data, well-log, and core data indicates that although depositional relief on both types of features may be low, they are nonetheless seismically resolvable. The small platform-top buildups are up to 0.16 km2 (40 ac) in diameter and have up to 10 m (33 ft) of independent closure above spill point. Backstep-edge oil accumulations occur within the structurally highest parts of the Leduc high-frequency sequence G downlap limit. Depositional relief along the downlap limit and associated trap closure ranges from approximately 5 to 15 m (16 to 49 ft). During 2003 and 2004, two platform-top buildups were directionally drilled, and one existing well located near a backstep-edge position and suspended since 1988 was reactivated. All three wells are successful and, to date, have cumulative production of 71 thousand bbl of oil. A total of 17 platform-top buildups and backstep-edge development drilling prospects exist across Innisfail and have expected-case recoverable reserves of approximately 960 thousand bbl of oil. These reserve additions suggest the potential for 1.14% field growth at Innisfail and are representative of the potential value that may yet exist within all mature Leduc fields in western Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.461
Threshold uncertainty score0.840

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.165
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAAPG BulletinSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207