MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2132932331 · doi:10.4081/gi.2010.e3

High fructose intake fails to induce symptomatic adaptation but may induce intestinal carriers

2010· article· en· W2132932331 on OpenAlexafffund
Debra Heilpern, Rateb Abbas, Stephanie Gladman, M. R. Menard, Byong H. Lee, Andrew Szilagyi

Bibliographic record

VenueGastroenterology Insights · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet, Metabolism, and Disease
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsFructoseIngestionMedicineLactose intoleranceGastroenterologyInternal medicinePhysiologyFecesLactoseFood scienceBiologyMicrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fructose has several interactions in man, including intolerance and promotion of some diseases.However, fructose in fruits and in prebiotics may be associated with benefits.Adaptation to regular fructose ingestion as defined for lactose could support a beneficial rather than a deleterious effect.This study was undertaken to evaluate symptomatic response and potential underlying mechanisms of fecal bacterial change and breath hydrogen response to short term regular fructose supplementation.Forty-five participants were recruited for a 3 day recall diet questionnaire and a 50 g fructose challenge.Breath hydrogen was measured for 4.5 hrs and symptoms were recorded.Thirtyeight subjects provided stool samples for analysis by selective culture of 4 groups of bacteria, including bifidobacteria and lactobacilli.Intolerant subjects returned a second time 15 days later.Ten of these served as controls and 16 received 30 g fructose twice a day.Ten of the latter returned 27 days later, after stopping fructose for a third challenge test.Student's paired, unpaired t-tests and Pearson correlations were used.Significance was accepted at P<0.05.After fructose rechallenge there were no significant reductions in symptoms scores in volunteers in either the fructose supplemented or non supplemented groups.However, total breath hydrogen was reduced between test 1 and test 2 (P=0.03) or test 3 (P=0.04) in the group given fructose then discontinued, compared with controls.There were no statistically significant changes in bacterial numbers between test 2 and 1.This study shows that regular consumption of high dose fructose does not follow the lactose model of adaptation.Observed changes in hydrogen breath tests raise the possibility that intestinal carriers of fructose may be induced potentially aggravating medical problems attributed to fructose. Materials and MethodsHealthy men and women aged 18-50 years were recruited through advertising within the

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGastroenterology InsightsSame topicDiet, Metabolism, and DiseaseFrench-language works237,207