MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133031383 · doi:10.1109/iros.2011.6094874

A computational approach for push recovery in case of multiple noncoplanar contacts

2011· article· en· W2133031383 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotic Locomotion and Control
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Stability (learning theory)A priori and a posterioriComputer scienceSet (abstract data type)Humanoid robotControl theory (sociology)State (computer science)AlgorithmArtificial intelligenceRobot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a new computational approach for humanoid push recovery in a generalized noncoplanar multicontact context. Our approach is based on a simplified model and consists of two main steps. The first one predicts whether the perturbed system can be stopped in a final static state while maintaining fixed contacts with the environment. This prediction can be seen as a dynamic stability indicator. The second one consists of a strategy that stabilizes the system, when stability cannot be reached, through a contact change chosen as the best one among a set of a priori possible contact changes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.932
Threshold uncertainty score0.666

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it