MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133049351 · doi:10.1016/j.clpt.2003.11.097

Time-dependent toxicity of sulfonamide reactive metabolites in cells of patients with sulfonamide hypersensitivity

2004· article· en· W2133049351 on OpenAlexaff
V Cukernik

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug-Induced Adverse Reactions
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSulfonamidePeripheral blood mononuclear cellToxicityPharmacologyProgrammed cell deathViability assayNecrosisDrugApoptosisHydroxylamineMedicineChemistryImmunologyIn vitroBiochemistryInternal medicineStereochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Sulfonamide hypersensitivity is a major clinical problem for many patients and the mechanisms remain largely unknown. We have previously identified altered response to reactive drug metabolites as an important component of drug hypersensitivity. Methods Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with a history of sulfonamide hypersensitivity (n=6) and normal controls (n=6) were incubated with increasing concentrations of sulfamethoxazole and sulfamethoxazole hydroxylamine over time with determinations of cell viability every 6 hours up to 36 hours. Cell viability was determined using an MTT method and the degree of apoptosis determined using FACS. Results A time-dependent decrease in viability was seen in the cells of both controls and patients, with significantly more cell death (p>0.05) seen in the cells of patients than controls after 12 hours of incubation (p>0.05). This was associated with a significant increase in cell death related to necrosis in the cells of patients (p>0.01) versus controls at time 24 hours. Conclusions Time-related delays in differential cellular sensitivity to reactive drug metabolites and differential mechanisms of cell death suggest that there are alterations in the ability of the cells of susceptible individiuals to respond that limits the ability of these cells to deal with reactive drug metabolites. Possible cellular mechanism(s) include may include altered ability to deal with reactive species. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2004) 75, P26–P26; doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2003.11.097

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Pharmacology & TherapeuticsSame topicDrug-Induced Adverse ReactionsFrench-language works237,207