MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133052936 · doi:10.1109/taes.2010.5417152

Maximum Likelihood State Estimation of Semi-Markovian Switching System in Non-Gaussian Measurement Noise

2010· article· en· W2133052936 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExpectation–maximization algorithmGaussianGaussian noiseMathematicsNoise (video)Estimation theoryMarkov processAdditive white Gaussian noiseAlgorithmNonlinear systemState (computer science)Kalman filterMaximum likelihood sequence estimationHidden Markov modelMathematical optimizationApplied mathematicsControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceWhite noiseMaximum likelihoodStatisticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the work presented here, we consider state and parameter estimation of a semi-nonlinear Markov jump system in a non-Gaussian noise environment. The non-Gaussian measurement noise is approximated by a finite Gaussian mixture model (GMM). We propose a maximum likelihood (ML) solution to this state estimation problem which leads to two expectation-maximization (EM) algorithms. The first is a batch EM method which takes all the available data in the conditional expectation of the state in the E-step. An interacting multiple model (IMM) smoother is employed to evaluate the conditional expectation of the state by which a suboptimal estimate of system state is directly obtained. The Gaussian mixture parameters are then updated in the M-step. The second is a recursive EM algorithm which results from a stochastic approximation procedure and uses a standard IMM filter. For performance evaluation, posterior Cramer-Rao bound (PCRB) on the state estimation is adopted. Simulation results verify the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.846
Threshold uncertainty score0.935

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it