MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133083187 · doi:10.4141/cjss09055

Environmental impact of repeated applications of combined paper mill biosolids in silage corn production

2010· article· en· W2133083187 on OpenAlexfundvenueaboutno aff
Bernard Gagnon, Noura Ziadi, Caroline Côté, Mary Beth Foisy

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Soil Science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHeavy metals in environment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Guelph
KeywordsBiosolidsLimeLoamSilageAnimal scienceAgronomyChemistryLeaching (pedology)Human fertilizationNutrientSoil waterEnvironmental chemistryEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental engineeringBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Paper mill biosolids (PB) may provide benefits for crop yields and soil nutrients. However, few data are available on metal accumulation and pathogenic populations resulting from applications in silage corn production. A study was initiated to determine the effect of annual spring application of combined PB during 3 consecutive years, with or without calcitic lime, on yield and on the environmental risk posed by N, P, heavy metals (Cu, Zn, Cd, Mo) and Escherichia coli to a silage corn cropped in a loamy sand in eastern Ontario, Canada. Treatments consisted of complete mineral NPK fertilization (PB0), 30 Mg wet weight ha -1 with supplemental N and K, and 60 and 120 Mg wet ha -1 supplemented with K, either with or without 2.5 Mg ha -1 calcitic lime. The PB at 30 Mg wet ha -1 with reduced mineral N and PB at 60 Mg wet ha -1 provided comparable yields to the mineral N fertilization in all years, whereas application of PB at 120 Mg wet ha -1 increased corn yield by 6.0 Mg ha -1 in the third year. After 3 yr, contents of soil NO 3 -N and the P saturation index (P/Al) were increased, indicating a possible risk of nitrate and P leaching. Lime increased soil pH by 0.8 unit, which in turn caused a large increase in the tissue Mo concentration and Mo uptake by silage corn. The PB, particularly at 120 Mg wet ha -1 , produced significant accumulations of Cd and Zn in soil, plant tissue and uptake. The PB showed small counts of E. coli, and consequently very little contamination was observed in the soil and on the harvested crop. Based on these results, the PB used are a good source of nutrients that benefits silage corn yields and represent as well a low risk for human and animal health and for the environment when the application does not exceed 60 Mg wet ha -1 yr -1 .Key words: Zea mays L., paper mill biosolids, lime, heavy metals, cadmium, molybdenum, Escherichia coli

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationalhigh
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationalhigh
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.597
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Soil ScienceSame topicHeavy metals in environmentFrench-language works237,207